Parashat Terumah: Jo, Walter and the Ark of the Covenant

 Jo and Walter were born nearly fifteen years apart.  Jo, on 5th September in Chicago and Walter, on 19th March in Idar-Obestein in what was ‘West Germany’.

Her father, Armando Tejada, was a Bolivian aeronautical engineer, whilst her mother Josephine was of English descent and the daughter of an architect.  Jo was the eldest of three children.  The family moved to San Diego when Jo was two years old and she attended the Pacific Beach Presbyterian Church with her mother every Sunday morning.  At the same time, her mother enrolled her in ballet lessons.  Many years later, she recalled her father as being a ‘dominating and tyrannical figure’ which led to her parents divorcing around the time she was finishing high school.

Blessed with beauty from a very young age, she won a number of contests which led to her being crowned the ‘Maid of California’.

Walter’s father was an American soldier and when he was two, his parents moved to Carney’s Point in New Jersey.  He had a younger sister and two younger brothers.  His mother obtained a job working in a bank whilst his father held down a number of occupations which included being a welder, factory worker and master mechanic.  In school, Walter had a noticeable stutter and he later recalled:

‘I had a terrible stutter.  But then I did some theatre in high school and when I memorized words, I didn't stutter, which was just miraculous.  That was the beginning of the gradual dispelling of my stutter.  I thought I was handicapped.  I couldn't talk at all.  I still stutter around some people now’.

In terms of his background, he described himself as coming from ‘a long line of blue-collar people’.

Who were Jo and Walter?  Both individuals achieved worldwide fame as Raquel Welch and Bruce Willis (dropping their true first names).

 

Sadly, Raquel passed away on 15th February at the age of 82 and a day later, Bruce’s family announced to the world that he had been diagnosed with frontotemporal dementia and that his condition had progressed to the point that ‘challenges with communication are just one symptom of the disease.’ He is only 67 years old.

In the 1960s and 1980’s, Raquel Welch and Bruce Willis could have been compared to Barbie and Ken as examples of their respective aesthetic forms.

As ‘The Times’ wrote in their obituary of Raquel:

They say a picture is worth a thousand words and with only three lines in the film ‘One Million Years BC’, Raquel Welch said considerably fewer than that.

Yet the image of her in her costume (I have edited the exact description for appropriateness) was far more eloquent.  The New York Times called the shot “a marvellous breathing monument to womankind” and, even before the film reached cinema screens, a publicity still of Welch in her cave woman outfit became a bestselling poster and had turned her into one of the world’s most alluring ____ symbols (fill in the blank)

Bruce, meanwhile, particularly in his John McLane ‘Die Hard’ role, represented many of our visions of what it meant to be a ‘real man’.  He was there, in the thick of the action fighting for justice against some really nasty individuals (who were more often than not, British) and getting really badly hurt in the process.  We felt his pain, yet we came back for more.  You knew that if you saw a ‘Bruce Willis Movie’, you wouldn’t leave the cinema disappointed; and we never did.  When he wasn’t running around barefoot in a tattered shirt and shredded, bloodstained feet, he was impressing us with his performances in critically acclaimed and commercially successful films like ‘Pulp Fiction, ‘The Sixth Sense’, ‘Twelve Monkeys’ and ‘Armageddon’, not forgetting his memorable earlier work on television in the series ‘Moonlighting’.

The same Bruce who stuttered.  The same Raquel who spent her life asking people to look beyond her outer beauty and consider the intelligence below the surface.  On one occasion she told a director that she had been reading the script and had (according to the Obituarist) ‘been thinking’.   He cut her short and told her, “Well, don’t!” How demeaning must that have felt?

I thought about these two actors when I considered this week’s Parasha.

The Torah tells us that Gd spoke to Moses and gave him detailed instructions on how to create many of the Holy objects that would populate the Mishkan (Tabernacle).

Exodus Chapter 25

Make an ark of acacia wood...overlay it with pure gold, inside and out and around it, make a round rim...make a table of acacia wood...overlay it with pure gold and around it make a gold rim...make the staves of acacia wood and overlay them with gold…

Many of the holy objects, such as the Aron Habrit, the Ark of the Covenant, which would house both the broken tablets as well as the second set of the Ten Commandments, were made of acacia wood, overlaid with gold.

Using a material as simple as wood to construct and house such holy objects seems inappropriate.  Rashi tells us that the Ark consisted of three boxes.  The wooden box fit snugly inside a large outer gold box.  Within the wooden box, a smaller gold box was inserted.  The outer exposed wooden rim (of the middle box) was covered with a gold plate.  In other words, the wooden box sat in the middle of the largest and smallest gold boxes.

Why not place three golden boxes, one inside the other?

Rabbi Shamshon Raphael Hirsch (d.1888) gave a beautiful explanation.

He said that, just like the Ark, we are the vessels that hold the Torah.  The Ark was made of two materials, namely gold and wood.  We are human manifestations of the Ark, in that we are living receptacles that hold onto the teachings of the Torah as we try to lead our lives according to its ways.  Like the kind of metal it is, we too have the purity of gold in our thoughts and actions.  However, there are always challenges from within and without that try to water down our faith, our belief in Torah and in this metaphor, pollute our gold.  Though gold as a metal is beautiful, it is indeed that – a metal.  It is static and cannot fight those who wish to sully it.  Wood, however, is different.  It is organic and like a tree, can grow and develop.  Wood is alive.  It gives us the strength to hold onto our faith and fight back against those who try to rob us of our beliefs and deny us our heritage.  The Ark had a gold surface, but at its heart it was made of wood.  As we say about the Torah every time we close the Ark:

“Etz Chayim Hi Lemachazikim Ba – It is a tree of life to those who grasp it”.

On the surface, Raquel and Bruce appeared to be human embodiments of gold.  Coruscating in their beauty but underneath they were, and are, just like the rest of us - organisms that are imperfect and vulnerable.  They remind us that, ‘not all that glitters is gold’. Sometimes we need to scratch the surface if we want to reveal the real people behind the studio-manufactured product.

The Ark of the Covenant and its companions may have been covered with gold, but beneath their exteriors lay the true beating heart of the Jewish people –the Torah that we cherish today.  Its wooden structure held firm and protected it, metaphorically and physically.  Gold might be beautiful but it is soft.  Wood may not be as aesthetically pleasing to the eye, but it is very strong.  It was the perfect combination.

We are the spiritual descendants of the Ark of the Covenant.  May Hashem bless us with the coming of the Moshiach so that we may finally see the Ark returned to the Third Temple – may he come speedily in our days – bimhera beyamenu, Amen!

Shavuah Tov

Sources for this Drasha (for Raquel Welch and Bruce Willis):

·         https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/racquel-welch-actress-dies-illness-lqffj9gwb

·         https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raquel_Welch

·         https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Willis

·         https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000246/?ref_=nmbio_bio_nm

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Parashat Miketz (Chanukah): Dreams

The Torah's Isolation-Busters - Turning the Negative into Positive

Parashat Mishpatim: Divine Blue